<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pelosi, Obama Split on Rangel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticians.com/2010/02/pelosi-obama-split-on-rangel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticians.com/2010/02/pelosi-obama-split-on-rangel/</link>
	<description>by James Richardson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:37:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mermaidiva</title>
		<link>http://skepticians.com/2010/02/pelosi-obama-split-on-rangel/comment-page-1/#comment-9388</link>
		<dc:creator>Mermaidiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticians.com/?p=1355#comment-9388</guid>
		<description>This smacks of more Obama political game playing. They think that the general masses are STUPID and love to play good cop/bad cop. Rangel should be forced to resign. In fact, the whole congress should at this point in the corrupted fog of politics presently going around in Washington under the Obama regieme. (Chris Matthews never heard of the word Regieme but strangely he himself is on tape referring to George Bush&#039;s presidency as the Bush Regieme - so who is kidding whom? The undercover deals, the way President Obama is currently pandering to his falling popularity numbers only increases my lack of respect. He cannot even stick to his own ideals! Whenever he says one thing (even if it takes him seventeen minutes without a teleprompter to answer a simple question) one has to be acutely aware of what his other hand is doing. He has now shown his cards and most of us are on to him and his Chicago type politics and it does not bode well with us. THE CHANGE people thought they might believe in has become a nightmare and Nov cannot come soon enough. Mermaidiva </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This smacks of more Obama political game playing. They think that the general masses are STUPID and love to play good cop/bad cop. Rangel should be forced to resign. In fact, the whole congress should at this point in the corrupted fog of politics presently going around in Washington under the Obama regieme. (Chris Matthews never heard of the word Regieme but strangely he himself is on tape referring to George Bush&#039;s presidency as the Bush Regieme &#8211; so who is kidding whom? The undercover deals, the way President Obama is currently pandering to his falling popularity numbers only increases my lack of respect. He cannot even stick to his own ideals! Whenever he says one thing (even if it takes him seventeen minutes without a teleprompter to answer a simple question) one has to be acutely aware of what his other hand is doing. He has now shown his cards and most of us are on to him and his Chicago type politics and it does not bode well with us. THE CHANGE people thought they might believe in has become a nightmare and Nov cannot come soon enough. Mermaidiva</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelosi, Obama Split on Rangel &#124; WTF?! Obama</title>
		<link>http://skepticians.com/2010/02/pelosi-obama-split-on-rangel/comment-page-1/#comment-7942</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelosi, Obama Split on Rangel &#124; WTF?! Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticians.com/?p=1355#comment-7942</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross-posted to Skepticians.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted to Skepticians.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelosi, Obama Split on Rangel - Jrichardson&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://skepticians.com/2010/02/pelosi-obama-split-on-rangel/comment-page-1/#comment-7920</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelosi, Obama Split on Rangel - Jrichardson&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticians.com/?p=1355#comment-7920</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross-posted to Skepticians.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted to Skepticians.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelosi, Obama Split on Rangel - Jrichardson&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://skepticians.com/2010/02/pelosi-obama-split-on-rangel/comment-page-1/#comment-7919</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelosi, Obama Split on Rangel - Jrichardson&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticians.com/?p=1355#comment-7919</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross-posted to Skepticians.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted to Skepticians.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
