<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter for Thee, Not Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticians.com/2009/11/twitter-for-thee-not-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticians.com/2009/11/twitter-for-thee-not-me/</link>
	<description>by James Richardson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:19:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stan SSO</title>
		<link>http://skepticians.com/2009/11/twitter-for-thee-not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5105</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan SSO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticians.com/?p=1076#comment-5105</guid>
		<description>James,

We&#039;re we lied to about Obama&#039;s BlackBerry?

Seems that if he can&#039;t type out a tweet, he can&#039;t email. So what was the big deal with the stories we heard in January about how big of a deal it was for Obama to have a BB...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/21/barack-obama-blackberry-national-security

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/01/obama_will_get_his_blackberry.php

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/01/keeping-the-bla.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re we lied to about Obama&#8217;s BlackBerry?</p>
<p>Seems that if he can&#8217;t type out a tweet, he can&#8217;t email. So what was the big deal with the stories we heard in January about how big of a deal it was for Obama to have a BB&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/21/barack-obama-blackberry-national-security" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/21/barack-obama-blackberry-national-security</a></p>
<p><a href="http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/01/obama_will_get_his_blackberry.php" rel="nofollow">http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/01/obama_will_get_his_blackberry.php</a></p>
<p><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/01/keeping-the-bla.html" rel="nofollow">http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/01/keeping-the-bla.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven R</title>
		<link>http://skepticians.com/2009/11/twitter-for-thee-not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticians.com/?p=1076#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s the tech luddite now, biatch?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s the tech luddite now, biatch?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter for Thee, Not Me &#124; Social Debate: Barack and American Politics</title>
		<link>http://skepticians.com/2009/11/twitter-for-thee-not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5095</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter for Thee, Not Me &#124; Social Debate: Barack and American Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticians.com/?p=1076#comment-5095</guid>
		<description>[...] President Obama&#8217;s admission that he&#8217;s Twitter-averse is not an acknowledgment that he&#8217;s old or even out of touch, like he suggested of Senator McCain. It is, however, emblematic of the duplicitous ends to which President Obama and his allies&#8211;complicit in this and countless other deceptive electioneering offenses&#8211;will go in the name of campaigning.Cross-posted at Skepticians.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] President Obama&#8217;s admission that he&#8217;s Twitter-averse is not an acknowledgment that he&#8217;s old or even out of touch, like he suggested of Senator McCain. It is, however, emblematic of the duplicitous ends to which President Obama and his allies&#8211;complicit in this and countless other deceptive electioneering offenses&#8211;will go in the name of campaigning.Cross-posted at Skepticians.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
