Comments on: Steele’s Job in Jeopardy, Again? http://skepticians.com/2009/04/steele%e2%80%99s-job-in-jeopardy-again/ by James Richardson Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:19:50 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Ali A. Akbar http://skepticians.com/2009/04/steele%e2%80%99s-job-in-jeopardy-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1882 Ali A. Akbar Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:33:23 +0000 http://skepticians.com/?p=730#comment-1882 There was a competency issue that I think extends more locally, than rests with the RNC. There was a competency issue that I think extends more locally, than rests with the RNC.

]]> By: James Richardson http://skepticians.com/2009/04/steele%e2%80%99s-job-in-jeopardy-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1852 James Richardson Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:43:25 +0000 http://skepticians.com/?p=730#comment-1852 I stand corrected, Adam. Republicans stood no chance in IL-05, which had an entirely different dynamic than NY-20 (i.e., Republicans invested money, man-power, and technology into this race). Moreover, that was in Illinois, can you really call anything from that state a "race"? I stand corrected, Adam. Republicans stood no chance in IL-05, which had an entirely different dynamic than NY-20 (i.e., Republicans invested money, man-power, and technology into this race).

Moreover, that was in Illinois, can you really call anything from that state a “race”?

]]> By: Adam http://skepticians.com/2009/04/steele%e2%80%99s-job-in-jeopardy-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1850 Adam Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:17:17 +0000 http://skepticians.com/?p=730#comment-1850 Mike Quigley, in IL-05, was the first Democratic Party victory post-November. Mike Quigley, in IL-05, was the first Democratic Party victory post-November.

]]> By: RedState http://skepticians.com/2009/04/steele%e2%80%99s-job-in-jeopardy-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1848 RedState Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:38:57 +0000 http://skepticians.com/?p=730#comment-1848 [...] Democrats now hope that by embarrassing Steele and drawing attention to Tedisco’s loss they can provoke greater Republican in-fighting. The Democrats obviously don’t want Steele to resign, he is, after all, the gift that keeps giving (elections), but creating the perception that Republicans do is priceless. [...] [...] Democrats now hope that by embarrassing Steele and drawing attention to Tedisco’s loss they can provoke greater Republican in-fighting. The Democrats obviously don’t want Steele to resign, he is, after all, the gift that keeps giving (elections), but creating the perception that Republicans do is priceless. [...]

]]>