Reforming, Top Down

The fact that Republicans lost their credibility with the American public on matters of ethics and corruption is no secret, but what still confounds the Party leadership is that we’ve yet to be forgiven for our many, many indiscretions.

In an email today to all 168 voting members of the Republican National Committee, Michael Steele, former Chairman of GOPAC and contender for the RNC Chairman, released his ethics package and proposed the creation of an “Ethical Review Committee.”  The committee, whose stated purpose is to create an ethics pseudo-contract to ensure Republican elected officials will abide by the “highest ethical standards,” will be staffed entirely by current RNC members.

Steele writes:

In addition to losing credibility as the reliable representatives of conservative principles, we Republicans are increasingly seen as challenged on issues of ethics and morality.

The conduct of our leaders should always be beyond reproach. As Party Chairman, I will stand up against those who abuse their public trust. I will assure the RNC leads by example. (Steele’s emphasis)

In a notable attempt to root out future unsavory Republicans – Duke Cunningham, Ted Stevens, Don Young – Steele proposed an embargo on all Party resources for incumbent officials who have been convicted on felony charges. In addition to the bar on resources, Steele’s plan calls for ending the RNC-dictated “preferred venders” program, a directive he alleges “diminishes our ethical standing, threatens our credibility with donors, injures the talented professionals who are doing good work, and harms our ability to win.”

To date, Steele is the only candidate to propose such an strict ethics agenda, however MIGOP Chairman Saul Anuzis released his 24-page tech-centric vision for the Party today. Given the relative silence from the remaining candidates on ethics-related issues, Steele’s proposal stands to position him as the reformer of the bunch — a position I’m sure he appreciates after the Blagojevich fall-out.

Steele’s full “Blueprint for Tomorrow” can be read HERE (PDF).


This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

4 Responses to “Reforming, Top Down”

  1. RedState says:

    Reforming, Top Down

  2. [...] Cross-posted at Skepticians.com [...]

  3. [...] Cross-posted at Skepticians.com [...]

  4. John says:

    This isn’t enough. The GOP has to deal with the millions of voters they’ve double-crossed, lied to, intentionally marginalized, etc. Voters like myself. I’m done with voting on party line basis. Just as an example, I voted for the GOP Senate candidate in Virginia regularly for years, until 2006. I happily voted third party that year and went Democrat this past election. I find the Virginia GOP to be even more noxious than the national party and I’m not alone in the Commonwealth. What the RNC forgets is that voters like me do not believe that the Democrats necessarily deserve to win, but Republicans give us more than enough reason to ensure that the GOP loses.

Leave a Reply